With such promotion of the vaccine, it’s easy to fool yourself thinking that the vaccine will protect you from all flu-like illnesses this year. Unfortunately, this is not true. A new study has exposed that “60% effective” flu shot as 98.5% useless. Every year the CDC recommends flu vaccine manufacturers to put in three viral strains they guess might be the most common infections for the flu season.

Possibilities

However, there are thousands of flu virus possibilities every winter you may come in contact with. If the flu shot you received do not contain the viral strains you come in contact with, essentially you have no more immunity over it then others who may not have received the jab. This makes the chances of you being protected very unlikely. The culprit for this toxicity is Thimerosal, a common additive and preservative that contains mercury.

There are no proven safe amounts of mercury in the human body and yet even vaccines that label themselves as “mercury-free” may contain traces of mercury up to 300ppb. To put things in perspective, anything over 200 ppb is considered toxic. There are many proven ill effects of mercury on the human body. Mercury is considered by WHO as one of the top ten chemicals or groups of chemicals of major public health concern.

Mercury

Mercury may have toxic effects on the nervous, digestive, and immune systems, and on lungs, kidneys, skin and eyes. Exposure to mercury – even small amounts – may cause serious health problems, and is a threat to the development of the child in utero and early in life. According to an independent study (means no pharmaceutical/vaccine companies were involved with the funding), multiple samples of many common vaccines were contaminated with glyphosate. Glyphosate is an herbal pesticide found in weed killers and the chemical has been linked to diseases such as autism, IBD and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Flu vaccines have time to time shown to have very minimal and limited measurable benefits for children, adults and seniors. Are you willing to accept the risks for a 1.5% benefit?